The court-appointed monitor overseeing reforms to the NYPD's stop-and-frisk policy has made his final recommendations.

Peter Zimroth submitted two policy changes to a judge.

One prohibits stops based on racial profiling. The other requires police officers to have reasonable suspicion before using stop-and-frisk.

They're also required to fill out a receipt explaining why the stop was made if the person isn't arrested.

NY1 talked to some young men in Bedford-Stuyvesant who said reform is long overdue.

"That'll help make any relationship better," said one man. "You got to start off somewhere, so don't start off accusing somebody right away if you're not even sure."

"I didn't have a choice. He just hopped out of the car, all three of them, start patting me down," said another. "One grabbed my wrist so I wouldn't run."

The Center for Constitutional Rights said it's a much-needed change in the culture of the NYPD.

PBA President Pat Lynch, however, said stop-and-frisk is a valuable law enforcement tool, and that these reforms jeopardize the safety of the public and police officers alike.